Aurangzeb: Zippy tempo, rocking performances!

A still from Aurangzeb.Aurangzeb is primarily about inheritance of character from parent to child.  And the opening underlines this theme with a quote from Roman poet Horace, ‘Deep in the cavern of the infant’s breast; the father’s nature lurks, and lives anew.’

What lends its sentimentality a crooked twist is how its premise is relentlessly influenced by the cutthroat philosophy of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. Director Atul Sabharwal tackles the conflicting interests of conscience and conditioning with his robustly executed first film for Yashraj.

Against the relevant backdrop of land-grabbing in Gurgaon and its deep-rooted network within corporate sectors, political parties and corrupt law and order, Sabharwal weaves an old-fashioned yarn about family – both close-knit and estranged.

On one hand there’s a family of cops – Ravikant (Rishi Kapoor), his nephew Arya (Prithviraj Sukumaran) and son Dev (Sikander Berry). The stern, resentful Arya models himself along the lines of the supremely assertive Ravikant as opposed to his long disgraced, defeated father (Anupam Kher).

Meanwhile, Yashwardhan (Jackie Shroff) is a successful tycoon running illegal industries, masked under the impression of his authorised businesses, assisted by the sharp Neena (Amrita Singh). He has given up on making sense of his brash son, Ajay (Arjun Kapoor), the proverbial cad whiling away his time partying with/beating up his annoyingly compliant girlfriend, Ritu (Sasheh Agha).

Light-eyed Agha, no matter how much (and frequently) she exposes, cannot distract the viewer from her serious lack of talent and feeble screen presence. Her so-called intense scenes with Kapoor are plain comical and completely dampen the screenplay.  She fares better in the recording studio with her spunky rendition of Barbaadiyan.

Rishi Kapoor in Aurangzeb.But this is only maybe five minutes of Aurangzeb, which starts off a tad synthetic with dialogues sounding like quotation books instead of conversation.

The real discord begins after Arya discovers Ajay’s lookalike, Vishal (Kapoor) and plants him in Ajay’s place to collect evidence against Yashwardhan in the backdrop of Gurgaon’s glossy landscapes (with surreal shots of its bokeh-lit traffic by N Karthik Ganesh).

There’s a dramatic twist here ( which I am obviously not going to reveal) that ensures Aurangzeb doesn’t draw too many comparisons from the likes of The Departed, The Devil’s Double or even Don. (Though there is moment that squeals Skyfall whereas the background score is reminiscent of The Dark Knight Rises.)

Deeply derivative of the traditional Hindi film narrative where blood-ties gain precedence over individual turbulence, Aurangzeb works even in its inept form. Because, one, Sabharwal constructs a compelling, intricate conspiracy of deceit and motive around predominantly grey characters, where chances are anyone can turn a volte-face, for better or worse.

And because Aurangzeb’s momentum is steady and swift (imagine a no-fuss karva chauth scene almost goes unnoticed in a Yashraj film?), the loopholes are skilfully minimised even if only temporarily.  So, sure, you do wonder about the loosely established relationships, convenient set-ups and undisclosed footage of significant reactions, but much later.

Interestingly, Aurangzeb doesn’t demonstrate any depth to examine the impact of role-playing, and change in circumstances on Arjun Kapoor’s psyche but both — Prithvi (by way of voiceover that offers a constant peek into his thoughts) and Rishi Kapoor (his candid conversation with Deepti Naval showing his innermost anxieties to his frighteningly supportive partner) — emerge as the more fleshed-out characters of this stylish drama.

This brings us to the second and most stealing aspect of Aurangzeb — its casting (Shanoo Sharma). Prithviraj Sukumaran’s clean-cut persona stands out in a role that demands subtle cynicism, restrained force, suppressed emotionality and dry humour.

Rishi Kapoor is at the top of his game and inspires awe through the stunning curve he draws within the story. To rave any more could lead to revelations that are best enjoyed on one’s own.

Prithvi in AurangzebThe other Kapoor, Arjun shows remarkable poise and volume in his second film and first double role in the company of stalwarts. Though it could have been a better written part (especially Ajay) he maintains a discerning distinction between the twain.

It’s also great to see Jackie Shroff render the proceedings with his characteristic charisma, warmth and grit in a somewhat neglected role.

Neither of the senior girls — Amrita Singh, Deepti Naval and Tanvi Azmi are moulded in pure convention and make a statement with their fiercely kohl-ed eyes and sturdy point of views. Sadly, in the case of their junior colleagues, Agha doesn’t have the potential while Swara Bhaskar isn’t given enough scope to bite.

Whether all kids inherit their parents’ moral temperament I do not know but where Bollywood is concerned, its conditioning on filmmakers is undeniable.  And going by what the inspired but engaging Aurangzeb has to offer, it’s not such a bad thing.

Stars: 3

The review was first published on rediff.com

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Sudarshana Dwivedi liked this post
Posted in Columns & Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Remembering Hema Malini’s unforgettable roar in Lal Patthar!

A still from Lal Patthar.What extreme repercussions can scorn and envy lead to are dramatically depicted in Sushil Majumdar’s Lal Patthar starring Raaj Kumar, Hema Malini, Raakhee and Vinod Mehra.

Through its intriguing narrative, which unravels like pages of a voluminous novel, Majumdar examines the nature of expectations and insecurities that nagged relationships long before the emergence of independent India or a modern, self-assured woman.

The 1971 hit is a faithful remake of Majumdar’s Bangla film, Lal Pathore (written by Prasanta Chowdhary) featuring Uttam Kumar, which came out six years earlier.

The black and white original, while nowhere as opulent as its adaptation, is extremely engaging, restrained and slightly more spelled out. At the same, its Hindi version scores in creating an enigmatic ambiance, vibrant visuals and baring the darkness of its protagonists concealed by an elegant exterior.

Lal Patthar, trails backs somewhere presumably in the 1930s, in colonial times when the prevalence of decadent royalty, rampant belief in cursed clans, plight of poverty-stuck women married off to men twice their age, exploitation of young widows, tradition of child marriages dominated most of its history and literature.

Though predominantly set in West Bengal, the title here refers to the red bricks at Agra’s historical landmark, Fatehpur Sikri, which acts as the majestic venue, tragic metaphor and startled spectator of Lal Patthar’s curious beginning, significant realisations and sinister third act.

Troubled by a great curse that runs in the family resulting in a lineage of mad ancestors, Raaj Kumar’s Kumar Bahadur Gyan Shankar Rai resolves to never get married even if that means giving up on the title of King (Raja Bahadur).

A still from Lal Patthar.Right from the beginning, Lal Patthar establishes Rai into a fascinating figure. He’s not someone you are likely to grow fond of but the dynamic greys he exudes make him an ideal subject for irresistible dissection.

He dubs himself as someone who ‘grew up to be a complex character’ attributing to his parents’ contradicting temperament – father’s a typical tyrant, mother brims with compassion.  And so on one hand, he harbours great interest in books, poetry and classical music. On the other, he embraces the self-indulgent ideals of his forefathers – nautch girls, hunting tigers, smoking cigars and gulping whisky.

A post graduate in psychology and history, his fascination with Fatehpur Sikri is gently underlined when he’s found reading a book on the same or how it’s his favoured destination to share with both his distinctly different companions (Hema Malini, Raakhee).

His relationship with these two women – the mistress and the wife, the guilt of wronging both and its devastating aftermath is ably conveyed by Raaj Kumar who lends Rai a judicious blend of charisma, quirk, desperation, arrogance and edginess. Not to forget, THE, dialogue delivery.

In the constantly hooking proceedings of Lal Patthar, Raaj Kumar quotes a few verses from Harivanshrai Bachchan’s Madhushala, ‘ Is paar priye, tum ho, madhu hai, us paar najaane kya hoga?’ and promptly rechristens Hema Malini’s Saudamini to Madhuri, the beautiful village widow he rescued from dacoits and unkind in-laws.

His attraction to Madhuri appears to be triggered by obvious lust and a sense of loneliness since he’s vowed off marriage. She’s understandably pleased about leaving her pitiable existence in a cowshed and playing ‘Maalkin’ in a princely mansion.

A still from Lal Patthar.Complications arise in this mutually-benefiting, so-called no-strings attached relationship when expectations surface.

He wants to play Professor Higgins (in the Bangla version, Rai mentions the inspiration out aloud) to his disinclined Eliza (some hilarious moments follow, just like they did with Amitabh Bachchan in Yaarana) and is completely put off when she takes too long (according to him) to transform herself from a paan-chewing Mowgli to a picture of aristocratic grace and refinement.

Meanwhile, Madhuri realises her needs only when she loses her undefined social status, 10 long years later, to Rai’s impulsive whim and sudden realisation of how quickly time has passed by with someone he’s grown bored of. So he goes back on his oath and buys himself a bride in the much younger and decidedly more sophisticated Sumita (Raakhee) from her drunkard father (director Majumdar is effective in a small role).

But it’s his explanation behind this action, ‘Sheesha toot jaaye toh phir jud nahi sakta usse badal dena padta hai,’ which exposes Rai as the jerk (no matter how articulate) he really is.

Interestingly, earlier when he asks Madhuri if she has any problem with his marriage, she is too proud and (dismissive) to admit in affirmative. When the possibility becomes a reality, she feels betrayed, demoralised and discarded after investing her all in a relationship that brought her riches but no respectability.

Using Raakhee’s past connection with her Germany-returned neighbour Shekhar (Vinod Mehra) to manufacture devious schemes, she turns into a bruised tigress, also symbolically planted in her chamber, hell-bent on bringing marital gloom for her offender and his docile better half.

A still from Lal Patthar.While Rai struggles between the women – his huntsman mindset pictures one as a tigress, another a lamb — and their domestic politics as does his increasing reliance on alcohol, mounting suspicions about his wife’s friendship with another man lead him on a path to ruin against Nabendu Ghosh’s mesmerising, thrilling screenplay.

It’s strange that Hema Malini’s role here is categorised as negative considering she’s just being human about the whole situation.  The whole ‘apna ghar todkar doosre ka ghar basaon,’ is not magnanimous, it’s ridiculous.

Lal Patthar, itself, doesn’t draw any judgement on her. She’s simply a strong woman dictated by her passionate, possessive heart not the diktats of society or its norms. So even if the climax perceives her as weak, I’d like to believe its Madhuri’s unconditional affection not any moral obligation that compels her to stand by her man.

Calling Lal Patthar her favourite performance in her entire career graph in an episode of Koffee With Karan, Hema Malini considers it  to be one of the ‘toughest’ too.

She simply couldn’t relate to it at such a young age especially because the concept of ‘rejection’ was alien to her given the overwhelming attention that followed her everywhere.

A still from Lal Patthar.Though only a few films old then, her regal demeanour and mature delivery in Lal Patthar is truly remarkable and scene stealing.

She’s unforgettably electric in the scene where she gives it back to Rai in Vrajendra Gaur’s hard-hitting dialogues, ‘Pyaar? Tumne kabhi mujhse pyaar nahi kiya. Tum sirf apne aap se pyaar karte ho. Mere zariye tum gudiya ke khel ka shauq poora karna chahte the.’ ‘Mujhe patni ki padvi di kabhi? Nahi. Isliye ke tum mujhe paison se khareed ke le aaye the. Apne mann mutabik banane ka khel khelna chahte the. Lekin tum mein sabr na raha.’

Besides marvelling at her drop dead gorgeous allure, one can actually note the change in her countenance as she changes from a quiet village girl to an assertive lady of the house to a roaring, wounded companion staunchly refusing to give up her claim. It is a treat to witness the sea of emotions her snubbed Madhuri undergoes.

Though originally intended for Vyjayanthimala, the Dream Girl earned tremendous acclaim and recognition as an actress who’s more than a pretty face and gifted dancer with this. That same year she impressed in yet another interesting (even if not too lengthy) role, of a lonely actress, in Vijay Anand’s Tere Mere Sapne.

The period drama’s other leading lady, Raakhee balances the volatile environment build by the two characters of whom she unwittingly comes in between. Delicate, fey and lovely, Raakhee is referred to as a ‘doll’ by Hema Malini and that’s precisely what Sumita lends to the story – vulnerability.

Both the women, decked in shimmering gold, draped in rich benarasis and dhakas, shot in Dwarka Divecha’s (China Town, Amrapali, Sholay) glamorously crafted frames are sights to behold.

A still from Lal Patthar.The music by Shankar Jaikishen against lyrics by Dev Kohli, Hasrat Jaipuri and Neeraj has its rewarding moments as well.

If Kishore Kumar’s silvery rendition of Geet gaata hoon main enjoys a place in all his Best of compilations, Asha Bhosle’s soul-stirring alaap that concludes Suni suni sans ki sitar par is designed to hypnotise.

With its rich production values and lyrical prose, the consistently enthralling Lal Patthar arrives at its wonderfully imaginative, deliciously bizarre climax.

What I admired most is how Chowdhary’s story doesn’t have a predictable bone in its nuanced body, which deals with several existentialist concepts like control, desire, insecurity, possession, atonement, regret, chastity and devotion.

All through its two and half hours running time, Lal Patthar sucks you inside its stark universe where perfection and idealism act as props against two fascinating embodiments of flawed morality.

This article was first published on rediff.com

You may also want to read:
Rekha’s breathtaking perfection in and as Umrao Jaan
Getting nostalgic about Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak
How Sohrab Modi won over Prithviraj Kapoor in Sikander
Ram Aur Shyam: Revisiting Dilip Kumar’s most delightful double role
Teesri Manzil: Style, substance, suspense and Shammi Kapoor!
The spirit of Mili lives on

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Sudarshana Dwivedi liked this post
Posted in Classics, Columns & Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Rekha’s breathtaking perfection in and as Umrao Jaan

Rekha in Umrao JaanDoes breathtaking have an expiry date? Not in Umrao Jaan’s case, no. No matter how many times I watch Muzaffar Ali’s tour de force Umrao Jaan, I am overcome with a sense of awe and elation.

There’s a paralyzing quality to his visuals, resembling living art work, which speaks its own language as exhilarating as the Urdu-laced parlance of its fragile inhabitants.

Based on a Urdu novel by Mirza Hadi Ruswa, Ali’s big screen adaptation doesn’t follow the chronology of the original literature but alters and compresses it substantially to compose his personal assessment of it.

Instead of a later-day author-poetess conversation narrative, Ali breaks up Umrao’s story into a heartbreaking coming-of-age of an artless teenager to a wide-eyed romantic and gifted poetess to, ultimately, a woman who has recognised the ugliness of the real world outside her equally unpleasant kotha through her relationships with three different men.

Umrao Jaan is not a cheerful tale. Her very being is steeped in painful irony, longing and lack of closure. Despite its imminent melancholy, the multifaceted Ali – a fashion designer, a painter, a poet and a bonafide royal (Raja of Kotwara since 1991), merges all his talents to craft a bygone atmosphere that celebrates beauty, poetry, lifestyle, culture, society, romance, music, design and spirit.

What lends it soul is an exceptionally majestic Rekha.

I had the good fortune of watching Umrao Jaan on big screen, the imagery of Rekha’s glistening tears, glittering jewels and glossy red lips is locked in my memory. But the intricacies underneath her enchanting surface can only be appreciated with enlightenment that comes with time and experience.

A still from Umrao JaanThere’s so much to revel in this fondly made gem by Ali, which begins sometime in mid-19th century and sets most of its premise against the decadent backdrop of indulgent Nawabs and appeasing nautch girls in the imperial city of Lucknow.

Abducted from her Faizabad home by the vile Dilawar (Satish Shah in a rare negative role) in a bid to teach her father (Ali in a cameo) a lesson for testifying against him in court, the recently betrothed Amiran, is sold to a Lucknow brothel owner Khanum Jaan (Shaukat Kaifi) while her fleeting companion in misery, another victim of human trafficking Ram Dei, is bought off by a noble household.

In one of its most unsettling moments, the seller-buyer parties casually bargain over the price based on the girls’ complexion and features underlining the crude, depraved ways of the trade. Khanum wards off her guilt, ‘Hussaini (her seasoned aid played by Dina Pathak), hum bilkul bekasoor hain,’ arguing had it not been her then someone else would have procured a deal.

After a struggle of nightmares, attempted escapes, furious beating, Amiran eventually comes to terms with her fate embracing her new life as Umrao Jaan ‘Ada’ (Rekha) — trained in dance, vocals and verse, gorgeously encapsulated against Ustad Ghulam Mustafa Khan’s divine rendition of Pratham dhar dhyaan.

Under the keen counsel of the father-figure of Maulvi sahib (Gajanan Jagirdar), Umrao blossoms into a refined individual with an inherent interest for writing verse. He inculcates in her the significance of khayal ki nazakat, alfaaz ki bandish.

Despite her evolved demeanour, she is completely attuned to the kitschy surrounding of flippant concubines and her roguish, good-for-nothing childhood mate, Gauhar Mirza (Naseeruddin Shah).

A still from Umrao JaanConditioned to charm and obey, Umrao questions very little but is quick to immerse herself in a sea of emotions oblivious to the short-lived allure of her attractive youth, the unreliable patrons of her mujras and the self-seeking double standards of a patriarchal society.

Both the naivete of her passions (Kahiye toh aasman ko zameen par utaar laaye. Mushkil nahi hai kuch bhi agar thaan lijiye) and the realisation of harsh reality (Jab bhi milti hai mujhe ajnabi lagti kyun hai? Zindagi roz naye rang badalti kyun hai?) is articulated to perfection in her penetrating ghazals, penned by the inimitable Shahryar.

Poetry (lovingly marinaded in impeccable Urdu) in Umrao Jaan is not a mere tool for applause. It’s a poignant mirror into her delicate, devoted and disillusioned heart. It’s what attracts her to Farookh Shaikh’s Nawab Sultan in the first place –Kyun aaj uska zikr mujhe khush na kar saka? Kyun aaj uska naam mera dil dukha gaya?

It’s a privilege to understand such resplendent sentiment; it’s a pity to translate it.

Umrao and Nawab’s romance swiftly progresses till the difference between their worlds catch up and test the muscle of their attachment.

Unfortunately, Nawab doesn’t have the courage to stand against his parents (though divorced) and gives in to his mother’s demands, marries a girl of her choice. In an interview to rediff.com, Shaikh observes, ‘Nawab’s character could not even bargain with his mother to be true to the woman he loves. That was a little alien to my own personality, and I had to prepare for that.’ The understated actor brings out this inadequacy and awkwardness rather commendably.

A still from Umrao JaanIn a cruel twist of fate, the girl he marries happens to be the same Ram Dei (Rita Rani Kaul); Umrao was pitted against in the beginning, leading to Khayyam’s mellifluous composition, Justuju jiski thi usko toh naa paaye humne.

One can write paeans in praise of Umrao Jaan’s greatest pillars — Khayyam-Shahryar’s beaming combination and the strength of its timeless melodies – Yeh kya jagah hai doston, Zindagi jab bhi teri bazm, Dil cheez kya hai In aankhon ki masti, etc as well as Asha Bhosle’s (and Talat Aziz’s skilful solo) rousing delivery of the same.

Constantly cheated in life, the viewer feels throbbing vulnerability around Umrao, especially when her less deserving peers have it so much better. Yet, despite the series of unfairness and heartbreaks, Umrao emerges as someone who has the will to survive independently. And even provide for.

She has a strange soft spot for the silly Gauhar who’s done her more harm than good. Naseer, however, humanises the scoundrel as a compulsively pathetic yet inoffensive sponge. It’s a tall order but the brilliant artist he is, he makes it look deceptively effortless.

Raj Babbar’s Faiz Ali is the third guy to walk into Umrao’s turbulent romantic life. Sly and uneasy, it’s not a spontaneous attraction and dictated more out of need than desire.

A still from Umrao JaanStifled by her controlled existence and the suffocating kotha, Umrao wants out and adventurous Faiz (Babbar is characteristically nervous but, thankfully, doesn’t get too much screen time) provides the perfect exit. But his true identity is eventually revealed and Umrao is briefly shaken before setting up her own independent business outside Lucknow.

In the space of damaged relationships concerned with keeping up appearances, Umrao’s unwavering commitment seems surreal — Tujhko rusva na kiya, khud bhi pasheman na hue. Ishq ki rasm ko iss tarah nibhaya humne, she proclaims in Asha Bhosle’s caramelised texture.

If this dreamlike quality contributes in constructing Umrao’s myth and mystery, Ali embellishes the ambiance with opulent authenticity. The tasteful colour palette, the shiny fabric – brocades, muslin, tissue, pashmina, the splendid embroidery, the grand haveli aesthetics (sets made on actual location by Bansi Chandragupta, Mansoor), the dazzling jewelry – maang tikkas, haath phools, jadau haars, studded rings, nose-rings, shimmering bangles, the props and artefacts – guldaan, hookah pipes, paandaans, chandeliers, tapestries, diwaans, chikk (bamboo blinds), sconces, lanterns, framed mirrors, lamps, swords, carriages and a supporting cast of people who hail from the milieu combines to create a striking opulence.

The costumes were done by his (then) wife Subhashini Ali. The actress, politician and activist reminisces to DNA newspaper how, ‘She was fortunate enough to know people who remembered clothes and colours and stitches of the time.’

She also sought help from actress Jennifer Kapoor (who had recently wrapped up work on her husband’s home production, Junoon) as well as received helpful inputs from Umrao Jaan’s co-writer (along with Ali and Javed Siddiqui), theatre personality, art-director and scholar Shama Zaidi.

A still from Umrao JaanMuzaffar Ali’s flawless detailing doesn’t miss out a single thing. Even the tabla players in the background are in perfect rhythm of Khayyam’s beats

While the grandeur is undeniable and understandable, what is remarkable is how Pravin Bhatt’s lyrical cinematography never distracts but enhances the mood and lends nuances associated with the period.

Exactly as Ali notes in chat with Dawn, ‘One of the aims of the film was to connect with the past with whatever was left of that era — the voices, the words and the stories. And Umrao Jaan seemed like an obvious story for me to express that feeling.’

A grand exterior can only wow momentarily but where Umrao Jaan succeeds is digging deep inside the tradition of discrimination, its impact on an impressionable psyche in the face of incredibly steady unfavourable circumstances. It’s not hard to understand her erratic behaviour or needy temperament in such an unhealthy social climate.

The opening credits show a young Amriran (Umme Farwa) in all her bridal fineries even as her mother (Farrukh Jaffer, also recognised as Natha’s Amma in Peepli Live!) lovingly decorates her with precious ornaments while Jagjit Kaur’s husky voice appeals Kahe ko biyahe videsh?

Few years later, Amiran, now Umrao, debuts her first mujra offering come-hither looks around a assembly of admirers in a red and gold benarsi, resembling a glowing bride only not quite. The paradox is most pinching.

A still from Umrao JaanWhile the politics of gender bias and social prejudices pops it revolting head quite frequently, there’s also a hint of progress through Dina Pathak’s ardent relationship with her lifetime companion (Jagirdar) even though they never entered matrimony.

Remember how Mirza plugs Umrao’s appeal to Nawab Sultan –Umrao Jaan ki taareef karna toh suraj ko chiraag dikhana hai. Aisi haseen ke pareestan ki paree zehar kha le. Shaira aisi ke ustaad kaan pakde. Aur awaaz, aah, shola sa lapak jaaye hai, awaaz toh dekho.

Umrao Jaan cemented Rekha’s golden aura and classic glamour in history. It also fetched her a prestigious National Award for Best Actress, an achievement she’s surprisingly too modest about. In many interviews, she hints at a low phase in her personal life during its making, which attributed to a persuasive performance.

The actress, though not an accomplished dancer, sends the viewer in a trance with her magical recital of kathak and perfectly delivered lines. The electric eagerness in her smile as a woman consumed by her passions is as compelling as the simmering agony of unrequited romance captured in her gleaming eyes.

She personifies poetry, which can neither be rewritten nor remade.

This article was first published on rediff.com.

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Posted in Classics, Columns & Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Of a boy, tackling geometry & coffee bites

AwwMonsoon and movies tend to bring out the nostalgia freak in me. I was watching bits of Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikander yesterday and they transported me to an old blog I had written in June 2007 to share this sweet memory from school.

‘It was a time when every dream appears attainable and stars shine extra bright.

It almost begins like a cliche.  I used to be a typical introvert, someone who barely spoke or mingled. He was vivacious, mischief personified. I was serious about studies. He was serious about cricket.  I loved fairy tales, he adored video games. We had only one thing in common — Ninth grade.

He was the cutest guy in my class (read universe) and totally oblivious to it. We had known each other all our lives, kindergarten onwards. We studied in the same school, attended the same classes, part of the same friends circle. Although sometime around secondary school, we sort of drifted apart. I was now part of a different group and dedicated to my syllabus.

Thing is, my geometry sucked. After a teacher humiliated me about it in front of the entire classroom, the sole objective of my existence became to redeem myself with respectable marks. My self-esteem was already low since, around 8th grade, I began wearing specs and was painfully conscious of it. (This couldn’t-care-less attitude takes a while to blossom.)

For the 2nd term exams that semester, I studied like a possessed maniac. Geometry wouldn’t have me. So I decided to have Geometry. I memorized every single  statement and reason, problem, number, solution in my textbook and guides. I had to succeed by hook, crook or mugging. I picked ratta maar. (No wonder that song resonates with me so much.)

Results were announced. Milestone moment — I scored, gasp, 73 out of 75. My universe was in a state-of-shock. The certified geeks mourned. The pretend geeks mourned too.  But, to a lesser degree. It was a moment straight out of Ripley’s Believe It Or Not. Guess hard work pays. ;-)

That afternoon, I showed the result sheets to the same teacher who had insulted me in front of all the other kids. Admonishment made way for applause. I had accomplished the impossible. I had done Pythagoras proud. And Holy Cupid, *he* was there too, applauding my miraculous achievement.

Later that evening, after classes wrapped up, I scurried homewards.  It was pouring heavily. Drenched and dripping, we both were walking on the parallel side of the same lane, no umbrella on either. I remember vividly. He wore a graphic black t-shirt and light blue jeans. I was wearing a lilac-hue dress with lace sewn around its sleeves.

My vision was hazy what with all the raindrops spattering my glasses. So I didn’t notice when he crossed the street. All of a sudden, he walked towards me and smiled. I returned his smile with a blushing ‘hello’. And then, he opened his palm containing toffees (Coffee Bite) and offered them to me. I picked one and thanked him. It was as though he meant ‘Congrats.’

Then he went his way. I went mine. I preserved that toffee wrapper in my drawer as a keepsake for a really, really long time.

That night, Pehla nasha played in a loop on my cassette player.’  ;-)

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bombay Talkies: An absorbing ode to cinema

Bombay TalkiesHindi cinema is too voluminous a medium, and now a century old, to try encapsulating its glory in 25 quick minutes. At the same, the broad appeal of silver screen and its gift to forge unique association with every single member of the audience is much widespread to ignore.

And that’s the idea behind Bombay Talkies, a cinema anthology, directed by Karan Johar, Dibakar Banerjee, Zoya Akhtar and Anurag Kashyap.

It’s not a comprehensive probe into the nearly-religious fervour for the movies or the innermost workings of showbiz. Instead what play out are four individualistic, intimate tributes by contemporary directors with a distinct approach to filmmaking.

If Johar is known for glaze, Akhtar brings perspective; Banerjee’s narrative breaks new grounds whereas Kashyap scores in nuanced writing. Their skill set varies from one another. To be willingly adjudged for their combined creativity, fully aware comparisons lie ahead, regardless of the fact that all four films are completely dissimilar in content, tone and texture reflects inspiring maturity, faith in one’s self and a sense of, well, sportsmanship.

Having said that, there’s a refreshing consistency in the intellectual aesthetics of all four shorts, it’s like a visual proof to the phrase ‘on the same page’ and it’s not something frequent. One could complain, where’s the signature touch? But in collaboration, the closer they merge, the stronger they emerge.

It certainly holds true for Karan Johar who begins with his offering, Ajeeb Dastan Hai Yeh. It’s not so much about moving away from one’s comfort zone as it is about testing one’s potential. It’s fabulous to witness him open up behind the camera like never before.

There’s an exchange between two characters wherein one says, ‘You wanna come in?’ To this the other responds, ‘You wanna come out?’ This scene, for me, defines the first segment of the story. What is it about? Let’s just say it’s an exploration into the anxiety, politics and provocations of urban relationships.

Where does the movie connect come? It’s subtle.

Bollywood, here, is part of small talk, zany humour, sacrosanct ambiance or a fodder for amusing theories. A kid on the bridge sings Ajeeb dastan hai yeh (Dil Apna Aur Preet Parayee) and Lag ja gale (Woh Kaun Thi?). A music enthusiast’s study is filled with rare records and movie memorabilia. Or picking a favourite between Sridevi and Madhuri Dixit determines, er, you’ll have to book a ticket to find out.

While a reserved Randeep Hooda and impudent Saqib Saleem articulate different kinds of intense, it’s Rani Mukerji’s flawless artistry as an imprisoned soul wearing a mask of normalcy, (even if you see those lovely freckles in all their splendour), which elevates the emotional core of Johar’s story, is its dignity and strength.

Bombay TalkiesSpeaking of strength, there’s tons of it on display in Dibakar Banerjee’s Star, which follows immediately after. Based on Satyajit Ray’s short story – Patol Babu, Film Star, Star features Nawazuddin Siddiqui as a struggling actor residing in a rundown chawl who wants to soar in the eyes of his daughter more than anything else.

Star, which celebrates the ties between opportunity and spirit, features an Emu, a supporting cast of ladies with melting smiles, some sprightly assistant directors and a masterfully utilised Sadashiv Amrapurkar.

And the camerawork by Nikos Andritsakis is simply brilliant in putting all of it across. Just that standalone moment with real cars rushing past a remote-controlled toy vehicle, their co-existence on an active street is so mesmerising.

Soon after the focus shifts on the figure controlling the remote, ‘Hum sirf bhai ko dekhta hai,’ he dismissively responds when informed of a movie star shooting nearby. And in one brief moment, Banerjee conveys the veneration reserved for the superstar of the masses –Salman Khan.

It’s tricky to discuss my favourite segment in Bombay Talkies without revealing too much. So I’ll just say this, even a 25-minute film can change the way you look at, the additions not extras, who fills the frames.

Siddiqui’s rehearsal scene and the actual filming are moments that inspire, motivate and create a cinema worth paying tribute to whether 100 or 10 years old. His Marathi is slightly rusty but when he excitedly divulges, ‘Tula mahiti hai papa ne aaj kai kela?’ against the stirring score of Rabindranath Tagore’s song —Tobu mone rekho, an accent seems too trivial a technicality to pit against his day’s achievement.

After the feel-good Star, it’s Zoya Akhtar’s turn to enchant with Sheila Ki Jawani. When I saw the promos, I thought her portions resembled Sudipto Chattopadhyay’s Pankh but I couldn’t be more wrong.

Bombay TalkiesAs children, watching your mother get dressed up, especially the delicate art of applying lipstick intrigues most of us. The only thing unusual here is that instead of a girl, it’s a little boy (Naman Jain) who shares this fascination. Pressurised by his well-meaning but stern father (Ranvir Shorey), he doesn’t care for football and harbours Katrina-Kaif inspired dreams. One might try to read more than there is in this premise but there’s just no need. Kids indulge in all sorts of silliness. Not every action needs to be rummaged for deeper undertones.

Recall a similar plot in Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna where Shah Rukh Khan disparages his son for picking music over sport? Akhtar, however, concentrates on the simple conflicts of childhood with dialogues that reflect their age, instead of the maker. So when one says, ‘Do you want to be an air hostess?’ The profundity in the other’s reply is as straightforward as, ‘No I want to be a passenger.’

The eventual pay off is reminiscent of Shashi Kapoor’s Bilva Mangal moment in Aag. Both the young members of the cast — Naman Jain and Khushi Dubey do really well as a pair of siblings looking out for each other. Jain gets extra brownie points for those terrific moves in the segment’s spectacular even if simplistic climax.

Bombay TalkiesAnurag Kashyap’s tribute to cinema, Murraba is dedicated to Amitabh Bachchan. Personally, I found it weakest of all the four films because its movement gets a bit repetitive after a while. Moreover, an overzealous Vineet Kumar as the Allahabad native fails to endear himself or gain sympathy in his fervent pursuit of Big B. Also his fixation is indirect so the hysterics don’t register convincingly.

There are some fine moments though. Despite all that build-up, Kashyap doesn’t compromise and turn the superstar into an accessible entity. He is used like an apparition, a believable, tangible apparition and he lets that aura remain. What I liked most was how he uses Mumbai, its people and how they survive on spunk and sense of humour without darkness taking over their being or livelihoods.

Bombay Talkies may or may not celebrate cinema in the direct sense. Except for its hopelessly tacky end- credits — a complete waste of star power and resources, the film is an absorbing ode to the language of cinema that is part of our collective system. It honours the imagination and enthusiasm that attracts so many young men and women in this country to embrace a life of risk and rush – filmmaking.

Stars: 3.5

This review was first published on rediff.com.

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Posted in Columns & Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Getting nostalgic about Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak

A still from Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.There’s a funny story behind how I watched Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak for the first time.

In 1988, when the concept of channels dedicated to trailers or YouTube was completely alien, we relied on the services of Chhayageet and Chitrahaar on Doordarshan for a weekly dose of soundtrack videos to enjoy everything new, popular or timeless.

Around then, I noticed the promotion for Mansoor Khan’s directorial debut is unusually keen. Sometimes they’d air more than one song from the about-to-release romance starring two unfamiliar faces – Aamir Khan and Juhi Chawla. And right before the clip, they’d play out its multiple posters, almost like a PowerPoint presentation.

Moreover, Anand-Milind’s gleaming score against Majrooh Sultanpuri’s fanciful poetry was a smash hit from the word go. Every single song –Papa kehte hain, Ghazab ka hai din, Aye mere humsafar, Akele hain toh kya gham and Kaahe sataye sung by Udit Narayan and Alka Yagnik made a lasting impression on its listeners. I heard this over my transistor from the legendary Ameen Sayani on his musical countdown, Cibaca Sangeet Mala and experienced it first hand when the frequent playing of its cassette resulted in recurring damage and buying three new tapes.

Now, summer vacations had just started and I was holidaying with my family at my aunt’s home who neither had a VCR nor a colour television. Owing to the instant hysteria it generated, tickets weren’t available easily (remember no multiple screens or show) but the video was out in the market within a week or so.

Yielding to my constant pleas, my aunt rented its VHS tape and asked her landlady in the adjacent bungalow to play the video, which was then relayed on our TV by using a splitter. (At that time, it felt like the coolest technology ever.) So this, ladies and gentlemen, is the extent of effort that went in for me to catch my first viewing of Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.

A still from Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.Eventually I watched it again, in colour (cameraman Kiran Deohans creates a ravishing imagery that’s as mint as its raw but skilful newcomers), on Plasma/LCD/LED/screens, the desktop, you name it, till I knew its entire screenplay by heart.

Still a primary school student when Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak hit screens, it’s incredible how affectionate I continue to feel towards this film, which released on this day, April 29, twenty five years ago. It’s like that line, ‘Humpar aapka bahut acha impression pada hai.’

Produced by the man behind dazzling entertainers like Tumsa Nahi Dekha, Teesri Manzil, Yaadon Ki Baarat, Hum Kisise Kum Nahin — Nasir Hussain, Qayamat Se…, directed by his son Mansoor, worked as a clutter breaker during a time Bollywood reeked of action and revenge, re-launching the career of two previously unnoticed actors –nephew Aamir Khan (in Ketan Mehta’s Holi) and Juhi Chawla (Mukul S Anand’s Sultanat).

Hussain’s last couple of films had bombed badly and the success of Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak (which would go on to become one of the first movies –at least in my memory — to be addressed by its abbreviated title, QSQT followed by the likes of MPK, JJWS, K3G, etc) was imperative. As luck would have it, it became a huge blockbuster and turned its leading duo into overnight sensations.

Though this Romeo and Juliet-inspired confection doesn’t have an exceptional storyline, Mansoor creates an endearing equation around the shy, aloof Raj (Aamir) and spirited, jabbering Rashmi (Juhi).

A still from Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.Lovers facing parental opposition against the backdrop of enemy clans is not a novel premise. But what sets QSQT apart is how Mansoor prefers to focus on building the connection between a boy and a girl from warring Rajput families, making them genuine and likable as well as a steady refusal to spin them into melodramatic beings on discovering each other’s true identity.

Where Raj and Rashmi are concerned, they’re both very young and petrified of their fierce, temperamental fathers preferring to lie through their teeth instead of engaging ugly confrontations.

Sparks fly between them immediately –all through the time a trigger-happy Rashmi clicks pictures of him against a sunset or when Raj cleans her wounds with cotton swabbed in Dettol following Rashmi’s heartfelt admission of her feelings for him to right till the part where the twain elope and play house on top of a rugged hill.

Even if they had to abscond, they could have planned it a little better. Like travel to a proper city, get a real job and get married in court instead of cutting his finger with a knife and doing a literal khoon bhari maang. But literacy is a dispensable concept in our movies and whether it’s Love Story, Dil, QSQT or Maine Pyaar Kiya, mostly runaway heroes prefer to be seen with an axe instead of a degree.

Despite this incredulity and growling, regressive daddies (Shaadi ke baad patni wohi karegi jo pati chahta hai) concerned with ‘khandaan ki izzat’ and ‘dushmani,’ QSQT endlessly charms.

The soundtrack as well as the part-booming, part-dulcet background score is terrific. The direction displays confidence and taut storytelling. And after a long gap, audiences witness the return of a chocolate-faced hero whereas the heroine, while dainty, is a refreshing change from all the coy types ridden by the waiting-for-the-guy-to-make-the-first-move syndrome.

A still from Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.He’s introduced strumming a guitar, she riding a horse. Aamir and Juhi convey this shift in dynamics flawlessly, intimately. Together they make a couple you’d like to see again and again. That none of their subsequent films worked until Hum Hain Rahi Pyaar Ke is another story.

The chirpy actress, who makes tons of cute faces and delivers various flirtatious lines in her sing-song style–Dettol wali koi chhot nahi/Humari shaan mein kuch aur kehna chahein toh hum sunne ke liye taiyaar hain — says, ‘Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak was like a college play. We would rehearse, laugh, play, shoot — it was wonderful.’

Aamir, on the other hand’ reveals he ‘was very nervous on the first day and sweating like a pig’ in an old issue of Movie magazine.

The superstar’s unease works to his advantage in scenes when the puny Raj turns into bashful Raj around Rashmi . Recall that embarrassment in his laughter (uh-heh-uh-heh) when Juhi presents him a set of photos she’s shot of him against the ‘doobta sooraj’ and a hilarious candid where he’s buried in a shawl in front of his friends?

His budding perfectionism is also evident in the manner he plucks the guitar strings while lip-syncing to one of his biggest chartbusters looking absolutely dapper in a white shirt, black vest and messy black tie.

Speaking of friends, Raj Zutshi as his cousin Shyam hits a sweet spot. The two previously worked on Ketan Mehta’s Holi. Then there’s a virtually unrecognizable Shehzad Khan as his hunting (oh yes, Pre-Satyamev Jayate Aamir pursues live prey even if we don’t see it happen since he’s too preoccupied with Juhi’s photograph to care) buddy Shahid who would go on to play Bhalla alongside Viju Khote’s Robert (he too appears as a drunk Thakur in a small role) in Aamir’s rip-roaring comedy, Andaz Apna Apna.

Also featuring is a really young actor/filmmaker Makrand Despande (credited as Mac Deshpanday) as the proverbial sleaze who tries to molest Rashmi. I hope you realise the other member of his vile gang in canary yellow pants is none other than Aamir’s younger brother, Faisal.

Nephew Imran Khan too makes his debut in a cute uniform to play a cuddlier version of his ‘Mamu’ in two scenes. The mild-mannered star had a massive crush on QSQT’s leading lady and even proposed to her with a ring on its sets. His mother and Mansoor’s sister, Nuzhat Khan worked in the capacity of costume designer.

A still from Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.The outfits, I must add (especially the ones worn by Juhi), — ranging from mirror-work lehengas, tie-and-dye duppatas and handloom-weave salwar kameezes – are simply gorgeous and create a distinct identity for Rashmi. Even the white chikan suit and red bandhni dupatta, Juhi wore in the forest scene was widely imitated by all the girls including a certain Anjali Sharma during that emotional railway station scene of Kuch Kuch Hota Hai.

QSQT, which is ranked among our best romances and a landmark film of the 1980s, enjoys quite a few accolades to its credit.

Besides a National Award for Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment, QSQT garnered seven Filmfare awards (Film, Direction, Lux New Face, Music, Cinematography, Male Playback Singer) including Best (Male) Debut for Aamir, a recognition he would later jeer at and refuse to be a part of.

The only thing I didn’t like (even then) is the unexpected, distressing end. Okay, so maybe the grandiose twins in its title *Qayamat* Se *Qayamat* Tak make its intention quite obvious. But as a kid, I had a hard time believing it actually happened. As an adult, I deem it, like Jai’s death (in Sholay), plain unnecessary and almost always skip the last ten minutes. Such denial doesn’t hurt.

In a fascinating interview to Indian Express, the director reveals how his father ‘insisted on a happy ending’ and would have preferred to see the bullets hit Goga Kapoor (he’s irredeemably mean) instead but Khan didn’t want to compromise on his vision and stuck with the tragedy. Clearly, the risk paid off.

The QSQT mania was unavoidable. Even the surprise realisation of Aamir Khan’s marital status to (then spouse) Reena Datta (she appears in a cameo as one of the students in the song, Papa kehte hain) failed to affect his popularity.

Juhi Chawla in Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.Back then, the local grocery shop sold something known as Jolly Sweets –along the lines of Willie Wonka’s Golden Tickets concealed in a candy wrapper. Only instead of a trip to chocolate factory, the coupon would get us a free postcard of QSQT (or Shahenshah and, later, Maine Pyaar Kiya). I accumulated an entire stack of its postcards.

When I met Juhi to interview her role as producer with Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani and to compile a list of her pick of the best-looking actors in Hindi cinema, I lightly mentioned how her pigtails were a huge hit among schoolgirls when QSQT came out and how I hated not being part of the ‘thing’ since I had a boy cut. Her response was a giggle mixed in disbelief and delight.

She’ll probably react the same way if I tell her how even after 25 years, ‘mazaa aa raha hai, kasam se.’

This article was first published on rediff.com.

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Posted in Classics, Columns & Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

My Experiments in the Kitchen: Bengali khichuri with begun and aloo bhaaja

I must have been 10 or 12 when I first tasted Bengali khichuri at my aunt’s home in Kolkata. I loved it so much, I requested her to make it several times during my summer stay at her place.

I’d devour on that mouth-watering, fragrant khichdi, which included so many delectable accompaniments like begun/ aloo/padval bhaaja and tomato chutney.

Later whenever I accompanied her and my mom to Yogoda Math in Dakshineshwar, the ashram folk would always offer this as prasad in earthenware on Gurudev Paramahansa Yogananda’s birthday.

Bottom-line, it’s my favourite version of the classic ‘khichdi.’ Only it’s a little more elaborate with roasted moong (golden gram), rice, veggies, spicy tempering and decidedly more tasty.

Last evening my cook informed she’s taking the day off the next day so then itself I decided I’d attempt one of my beloved comfort foods. For recipe, you can try this video, it almost resembles what Mausi does. Instead of cauliflower, which I dislike in rice, I used carrots.

Bhaaja doesn’t require any deep wisdom; it’s basically aubergine or potatoes marinaded in salt and turmeric and shallow fried in (preferably) mustard oil.

Once the khichuri and bhaaja comes together in its piping hot body, the final result is nothing short of drool-inducing.

Lunch, today, took a while to get ready but it was totally worth the effort.

Bengali khichuri with begun and aloo bhaaja Bengali khichuri with begun and aloo bhaajaBengali khichuri with begun and aloo bhaajaBengali khichuri with begun and aloo bhaaja

Share via email+1Pin it on PinterestShare on TumblrDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUponSubmit to reddit
Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments